House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Chairman James Comer has expressed support for the findings of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Inspector General’s review of inspection processes at Tennessee Walking Horse competitions. The review was initiated after allegations of arbitrary enforcement of the Horse Protection Act (HPA) by the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS).
Comer stated, “The USDA Inspector General’s review confirms our Committee’s findings of inconsistent enforcement of the Horse Protection Act by APHIS at Tennessee Walking Horse competitions. I am encouraged that these findings align and fully support the Inspector General’s new recommendations to strengthen the horse inspection process.”
The Inspector General’s report highlighted several key areas needing improvement. It found that APHIS lacked a conflict-of-interest policy, which has since been implemented following recommendations. The feasibility of an on-site appeals process is currently being assessed by APHIS, addressing concerns about horse disqualification.
Veterinary inspection protocols were found to have critical gaps despite an existing framework, and communication with show management was inconsistent, leading to confusion in rule implementation. These issues are now being addressed as per the Inspector General’s guidance.
Comer emphasized the importance of these reforms, stating, “Key measures such as implementing a clear conflict-of-interest policy, enhancing the on-site appeals process and veterinary inspection protocols, and updating guidance for horse show organizers are essential steps toward restoring trust and ensuring consistent enforcement of the HPA.”
He urged APHIS to act swiftly in implementing these changes to address concerns from Tennessee Walking Horse competitors both in Kentucky and nationwide.
